<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Inca Knots &#8211; Decoding Mysterious Felt Language Of The Incas	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.machupicchutrek.net/inca-knots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.machupicchutrek.net/inca-knots/</link>
	<description>Machu Picchu and Inca Trail Trek Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kristin		</title>
		<link>https://www.machupicchutrek.net/inca-knots/#comment-12535</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.machupicchutrek.net/?p=2134#comment-12535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I read of the quipu recently in a chapter by John Timbs. He wrote a rather detailed explanation of the &#034;code&#034;, the Inca kept a sort of census record, the knots were their system. I am a bit unnerved, the code was broken a very long time ago by the explorer Markham.  Timb&#039;s writes &#034;The well-known contrivance of the Quipus, or method of counting and even recording events by means of cords, was equally ingenious and original. The quipus of the Peruvians were of twisted wool, and consisted of a thick cord, with threads more or less fine, attached to the main part. The smaller lines were covered with knots, either single or double. The size of the quipus varies much, sometimes the main cord being five or six yards long, and at others not more than a foot; the branches rarely exceeding a yard in length, and being sometimes shorter. In the neighbourhood of Lurin, on the coast of Peru, a quipu was found which weighed twelve pounds. The different colours of the threads had different meanings: thus, the red signified a soldier, or war; the yellow gold; the white, silver, or peace, &#038;c. In the system of arithmetic, a single knot signified 10, two single knots 20, a double knot 100, a triple knot 1000, and so on to higher numbers. But not only the colour and mode of combining the knots, but also the laying-up of the strands of the cord, and the distances of the threads apart, were of great importance in reading the quipus. It is probable that in the earliest times this ingenious contrivance was merely used for enumeration, as the shepherd notches the number of his sheep on a stick; but in the course of time the science was so much improved that the initiated were able to knot historical records, laws, and decrees, so that the great events of the empire were transmitted to posterity; and, to some extent, the quipus supplied the place of chronicles and national archives. The registry of tributes, the census of populations, the lists of arms, of soldiers, and of stores, the supplies of maize, clothes, shoes, &#038;c., in the storehouses, were all specified with admirable exactness by the quipus; and in every[149] town of any importance, there was an officer, called the quipu camayoc, to knot and decipher these documents.&#034; Timb&#039;s notes it is from —&#034;Markham’s Visit to Peru.&#034; (which see). It is highly possible that someone today believed they did indeed &#034;discover&#034; the code of the knots, but a student..? any researcher worth their salt would bother to spend some wee morning hours scouring research papers and the old stand-by the public domain- of which that chapter quoted sits- in Gutenberg. Markham&#039;s travels which describe the quipu are more detailed. Go to archive dot org, search All Texts, and for a great starting point use &#034;Markham&#034; and &#034;Inca&#034; for search terms. I find it suspect that a student would not have seen these papers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read of the quipu recently in a chapter by John Timbs. He wrote a rather detailed explanation of the &quot;code&quot;, the Inca kept a sort of census record, the knots were their system. I am a bit unnerved, the code was broken a very long time ago by the explorer Markham.  Timb&#039;s writes &quot;The well-known contrivance of the Quipus, or method of counting and even recording events by means of cords, was equally ingenious and original. The quipus of the Peruvians were of twisted wool, and consisted of a thick cord, with threads more or less fine, attached to the main part. The smaller lines were covered with knots, either single or double. The size of the quipus varies much, sometimes the main cord being five or six yards long, and at others not more than a foot; the branches rarely exceeding a yard in length, and being sometimes shorter. In the neighbourhood of Lurin, on the coast of Peru, a quipu was found which weighed twelve pounds. The different colours of the threads had different meanings: thus, the red signified a soldier, or war; the yellow gold; the white, silver, or peace, &amp;c. In the system of arithmetic, a single knot signified 10, two single knots 20, a double knot 100, a triple knot 1000, and so on to higher numbers. But not only the colour and mode of combining the knots, but also the laying-up of the strands of the cord, and the distances of the threads apart, were of great importance in reading the quipus. It is probable that in the earliest times this ingenious contrivance was merely used for enumeration, as the shepherd notches the number of his sheep on a stick; but in the course of time the science was so much improved that the initiated were able to knot historical records, laws, and decrees, so that the great events of the empire were transmitted to posterity; and, to some extent, the quipus supplied the place of chronicles and national archives. The registry of tributes, the census of populations, the lists of arms, of soldiers, and of stores, the supplies of maize, clothes, shoes, &amp;c., in the storehouses, were all specified with admirable exactness by the quipus; and in every[149] town of any importance, there was an officer, called the quipu camayoc, to knot and decipher these documents.&quot; Timb&#039;s notes it is from —&quot;Markham’s Visit to Peru.&quot; (which see). It is highly possible that someone today believed they did indeed &quot;discover&quot; the code of the knots, but a student..? any researcher worth their salt would bother to spend some wee morning hours scouring research papers and the old stand-by the public domain- of which that chapter quoted sits- in Gutenberg. Markham&#039;s travels which describe the quipu are more detailed. Go to archive dot org, search All Texts, and for a great starting point use &quot;Markham&quot; and &quot;Inca&quot; for search terms. I find it suspect that a student would not have seen these papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
